AFLATOXIN
Aflatoxin Home
Aspergillus and Aflatoxin in Groundnut
| Search |
Science with a Human face Introduction Literature Staff Aflatoxin Presentations MYCO-GLOBE INCO-AFLA Feedback ICRISAT.org

Strategies for reducing aflatoxin levels in groundnut-based foods and feeds in India: A step towards improving health of humans and livestock
Dr Peter Craufurd
The University of Reading, U.K
Funded by Department for International Development (DFID): Crop Protection Programme (CPP) / Crop Post-Harvest Programme (CPHP)


Project Partners

  • ANGRAU, Anantapur
  • STAAD, Hyderabad
  • AME, Bangalore
  • ICRISAT
  • University of Belfast, UK
  • University of Reading, UK

Project started July 2000

Six objectives :

# 1 Project Objectives

Describe pre- and post-harvest groundnut production and processing practices of farmers and processors
Find out if stakeholders are aware of aflatoxin [2000/01]

Output 1: groundnut production & processing practices

Visits/ interviews/ case studies with:

  • Farmers in:
    - 4 villages in Anantapur District
    - 2 villages in Pileru, Chittoor District
  • In market yards and with traders & processors in Anantapur & Pileru

Output 1: groundnut production & processing practices

Major outcomes

  • There are socio-economic/ livelihood factors affecting adoption aflatoxin reducing technologies
  • There are no incentives to produce aflatoxin-free produce
  • There is no awareness of aflatoxin by farmers or processors

# 2  Project Objectives

  1. Survey of aflatoxin contamination in groundnut: pods & haulms at harvest & during storage; groundnut-derived confectionary products; and milk [2000/01]

    Develop molecular tools to characterise toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus [2001]

Output 2: Survey of aflatoxin contamination

Farmers’ fields in Anantapur

Year No. fields % Samples > permissible limit 10 ug/ kg % Samples >100 ug/ kg
2000 126 26 17
2001 96 31 8

Output 2: Survey of aflatoxin contamination

Milk & traders/ millers in 2000/02

/

No. samples % Samples > permissible limit % Samples > 100 ug/ kg
Raw buffalo milk 352 53 0
Raw cow milk 50 34 0
Groundnut fodder 80 30 3

Traders

229 30 14
Oil millers 223 25 7

Output 2: Survey of aflatoxin contamination

Market samples in 2002

Crop No. samples % Samples > permissible limit (10 ug/kg) % Samples > 100 ug/ kg
Maize 72 43 7
Sorghum seed 8 0 0
Soyabean cake 19 89 0
Groundnut cake 7 100 71
Groundnut seed 25 28 7
Cotton cake 6 100 0

# 3 Project Objectives

  • Determine factors affecting aflatoxin contamination: pre-harvest in farmer’s fields through harvesting, drying, stacking and storage by farmers and traders/ processors, i.e. follow the chain of infection & contamination [2001/02]

Output 3: factors affecting contamination

Two factors are needed for aflatoxin contamination:

  • Infection of pods and kernels (seeds) with Aspergillus flavus
  • Favourable conditions for the production of aflatoxin by A. flavus

Output 3: factors favouring infection & contamination

Fungus, A. flavus Aflatoxin production
  • High relative humidity
  • Temperature 25-35oC
  • Kernel (seed) moisture content 10-30%
  • Many damaged pods
  • soil or air temperature c. 30oC
  • >25d drought at end of season
  • kernel moisture content 10-30%

NOTE: undamaged pods can be infected and contaminated

Output 3: when can infection & contamination occur?

At all stages from start of pod production in the field through storage and processing to consumption

Pre-harvest when pods are growing Click here for image

At harvesting Click here for image

During drying of haulms/pods in the fieldClick here for image

In the stack, and subsequent storage Click here for image

Factors affecting aflatoxin contamination Click here for image

# 4 Project Objectives

Produce a short-list of ‘technology’ options to reduce aflatoxin contamination based on the findings of Project Outputs 1, 2 & 3 [2002]

Output 4: technology options

Pre-harvest

  • Genetic (variety) tolerance/resistance to infection and/or contamination
  • Biological control of A. flavus
  • Agronomic practices that improve soil water retention and reduce the effect of drought and high soil temperature during pod growth

Post-harvest

  • Rapid drying of pods/ kernels to <10% moisture content
  • Removal all damaged or mouldy pods
  • Store pods in conditions unfavourable to infection & contamination: dry, well aerated, insect-free

# 5 Project Objectives

Discuss ‘short-list’ (Output 4) with farmers, and validate on-station and on-farm in partnership with farmers and extension agencies [2002]

# 6 Project Objectives

Identify target institutions and partnerships to promote public awareness of aflatoxin, and to develop and advocate strategies and policies that enable the production of aflatoxin-free groundnut

Thank you

Donors: DFID Crop Protection Programme, DFID Crop Post-Harvest Programme

Hosts: ICRISAT

Participants at today’s meeting for their time

Take you to the top page
Image Gallery
Image Gallery
AflatoxinAflatoxinAflatoxin
   
On-farm management of aflatoxin contamination of groundnut in West Africa.
1)English
2)French
Pre and Postharvest Management of Aflatoxin Contamination in Groundnut
Peanut CRSP Progress
Annoucement
Bulletin board
Effects of Aflatoxin on Health
Scholar's Activities
Training info.

Aspergillus flavus and
A. parasiticus

Zoom in pictureZoom in pictureZoom in picture
Aflatoxin Estimation by Elisa
Farmers practices and socioeconomic issues in groundnut based livelihood system
ICRISAT Strategy
Useful Links

Aflatoxin research on:
Sources of resistance
Breeding for resistance
Integrated aflatoxin management
Biological Control
Approaches for Bio-technologies
Diagnostic tools
Crops Contaminated by A. flavus and Aflatoxin in India (Data from recent surveys).

Post - harvest technologies
1) English
2) French
3) Hindi

Copyright © 2000 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Fair use of material is encouraged. Proper citation is requested.